4 Comments
User's avatar
Gisg's avatar
Jan 20Edited

The office-centric economy is not a public good, thus the remote worker *mandated*, not *choosing* to go back in person is performing no civic duty.

These conditions are not accidental. They follow from long-term, path-dependent choices about planning and capital deployment made by a small, insular group of decision-makers.

No one voted to create office buildings that can only serve a single purpose, no public demanded rigid zoning that blocks adaptation, and no collective body chose to structure cities around a narrow peak-hour commuting model.

Those constraints were voluntarily adopted by planners, developers, and financial actors pursuing a particular equilibrium that worked for them.

When that equilibrium breaks down, it is unreasonable to shift the expectation to restore it onto everyone else.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 20
Comment removed
Gisg's avatar

I don't believe we should *mandate* people to commute for reasons that have nothing to do with the specific outcomes and expectations of their job role.

Steve Glynn's avatar

I think I agree. I wasn't trying to make that argument vs. providing an addition perspective on how return to office can help the Milwaukee community.

Steve Glynn's avatar

Thanks for the thoughtful response.